Prepared by Aiysha Mirza, CMR Group
As part of a project to compare measures of personal well-being and economic data, we are looking to test the validity/relevance of the current topics of questioning and how extensive the current measures are. We analyse this using information on the changes and trends of the main personal and economic well-being measures often measured quarterly. The data for this report is sourced from ONS’s report “Personal and economic well-being dashboard of indicators” released in September 2020.
The objective of this report is to compare well-being and economic variables and find the relationship between them. The end goal is to help evaluate a wide range of topics which underlie concepts of well-being so that we can assess our current measures of well-being.
We find the relationship of these variables by using correlations. All correlations are calculated using the function in excel with a percentage format. A score of 100% indicates a perfect positive correlation, a -100% indicates a perfect negative correlation and a value near 0% indicates no correlation.
First, we are comparing personal well-being. Variables that all have a very high correlation are low life satisfaction, low worthwhile and low happiness. All these variables significantly correlate with each other.
Correlation Values |
Variable 1 |
Variable 2 |
Significance Level |
96.3% |
low life satisfaction |
low worthwhile |
99% |
95.5% |
low life satisfaction |
low happiness |
99% |
91.1% |
low worthwhile |
low happiness |
99% |
High anxiety has the lowest correlation with all the personal well-being variables, the correlation with low happiness being the lowest. Note that it is still significant.
Correlation Values |
Variable 1 |
Variable 2 |
Significance Level |
59.4% |
low worthwhile |
high anxiety |
99% |
55.3% |
low life satisfaction |
high anxiety |
99% |
52.7% |
low happiness |
high anxiety |
99% |
Now we introduce economic variables in relation to the personal well-being variable of high anxiety. These seem to have quite low correlation except when we compare high anxiety and debt to income ratio.
Correlation Values |
Variable 1 |
Variable 2 |
Significance Level |
58.9% |
debt to income ratio |
high anxiety |
99% |
-37.9% |
aggregate balance |
high anxiety |
95% |
22.6% |
unemployment rate |
high anxiety |
80% |
Correlations between personal well-being data and economic data show the relationship between wealth and satisfaction. Low life satisfaction has significant correlations with unemployment rate, debt to income ratio, aggregate balance etc.
Correlation Values |
Variable 1 |
Variable 2 |
Significance Level |
91.2% |
debt to income ratio |
low life satisfaction |
99% |
-89.0% |
aggregate balance |
low life satisfaction |
99% |
88.4% |
unemployment rate |
low life satisfaction |
99% |
Comparing more well-being and economic data shows the correlation between unemployment rate and low happiness seems to be particularly high
Correlation Values |
Variable 1 |
Variable 2 |
Significance Level |
91.5% |
unemployment rate |
low happiness |
99% |
90.8% |
debt to income ratio |
low worthwhile |
99% |
-88.4% |
aggregate balance |
low happiness |
99% |
-87.7% |
aggregate balance |
low worthwhile |
99% |
87.4% |
debt to income ratio |
low happiness |
99% |
82.1% |
unemployment rate |
low worthwhile |
99% |
Here we compare economic data. Real Gross Household Disposable Income per head (RHDI), Real Net National Disposable Income (RNNDI) and spending per head notably correlate with each other.
Correlation Values |
Variable 1 |
Variable 2 |
Significance Level |
95.5% |
RNNDI per head |
spending per head |
99% |
93.7% |
RHDI per head |
spending per head |
99% |
90.5% |
RHDI per head |
net wealth per head |
99% |
88.4% |
net wealth per head |
spending per head |
99% |
87.2% |
RHDI per head |
RNNDI per head |
99% |
81.6% |
RNNDI per head |
net wealth per head |
99% |
There is very clearly high correlation between personal well-being and economic variables supporting a strong relationship between financial security, wealth, and mental health. In terms of variables with high correlation, such as low life satisfaction and low worthwhile, an argument can be made that not both variables need to be surveyed as they measure similar things.
We do have to keep in mind that these variables could have different correlations at the micro level, for example a particular demographic may have a lower correlation between low life satisfaction and low worthwhile than others. In this case it would be beneficial to keep both variables with a demographic breakdown.